Zelenskyy: Trump prioritizing Putin phone call ‘displeasing’
- Zelenskyy expressed concern over Trump’s call to Putin before speaking with him.
- Trump announced plans for US-Russia negotiations to end the war.
- Zelenskyy emphasized Ukraine’s participation is essential in any agreements.
- Ukraine continues to face fierce battles on the frontlines with Russia.

Zelenskyy’s Response to Trump’s Call With Putin
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy publicly expressed his dissatisfaction following U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement of having spoken with Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding the ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia. Trump’s decision to prioritize a call with Putin before reaching out to Zelenskyy has raised eyebrows and concerns among Ukrainian leadership.
Addressing the media on Thursday, Zelenskyy shared that the development was “not very pleasant.” He pointed out that Russia appears to be seeking bilateral negotiations with the United States, circumventing Ukraine’s critical involvement in any potential peace agreements. This, according to him, aligns with Putin’s strategy to shape outcomes in Russia’s favor, disregarding Ukraine’s sovereignty and stake in the conflict resolution process.
Ukraine’s Stance on Peace Negotiations
In his statement, Zelenskyy reiterated that Ukraine “cannot accept any agreements without our participation.” He emphasized that international discussions and agreements must include Ukraine as a decisive player. Forging a peace agreement without Ukraine, he indicated, would undermine the country’s role and interests in the ongoing conflict and could set a dangerous precedent for future international diplomacy.
The Ukrainian president has consistently championed the notion that Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity are non-negotiable. This latest development highlights the complexities surrounding U.S.-Russia dialogue and Kyiv’s apprehensions about being sidelined during negotiations.
The Ground War: Dwindling Ukrainian Gains
Meanwhile, Oleksandr Syrskyi, Ukraine’s military commander-in-chief, provided an update on the territorial situation in the Kursk region of western Russia. Currently, Ukrainian troops control approximately 500 square kilometers of regained territory—less than half of the 1,300 square kilometers they initially captured during their offensive campaign.
This development indicates a significant resurgence in Russia’s counteroffensive operations, underlining the dynamic and fiercely contested nature of the frontlines between Russia and Ukraine. Combat remains intense as both sides attempt to establish advantageous positions, particularly in light of potential ceasefire talks.
Global Implications and the Path Forward
The implications of Trump’s call surpass the immediate dynamics of U.S.-Ukraine-Russia relations. By engaging directly with Putin, Trump may unwittingly reinforce Moscow’s effort to negotiate a settlement that circumvents Ukraine’s role. This poses not just a challenge to Ukraine but also to the broader international framework that supports the sovereignty of nations embroiled in conflict.
As fierce battles continue on the ground, questions remain about how the international community, including key players such as the United States, will navigate the challenges of peace talks without sidelining Ukraine or compromising its territorial aspirations. How these conversations will play out in the coming months will define not just the war’s resolution but also the norms of 21st-century international diplomacy.
The Role of Global Leaders
Global leaders face mounting pressure to balance diplomacy, conflict resolution, and respect for sovereignty in the Ukraine-Russia war. While Zelenskyy strives to ensure Ukraine’s inclusion in negotiations, the appeal of swift, bilateral agreements may overshadow the need for a comprehensive, inclusive peace process. The international community must remain vigilant and supportive of principles ensuring fairness and equity in resolving such high-stakes conflicts.
Commentary
A Delicate Balance in Diplomacy
The recent announcement by former U.S. President Donald Trump regarding his call with Vladimir Putin underscores the fragility and complexity of international diplomacy in the context of the Ukraine-Russia war. Trump’s decision to initiate dialogue with Putin before speaking with Zelenskyy is not just a diplomatic faux pas—it reveals inherent challenges in managing multilateral conflicts amidst competing national interests.
Ukraine’s Perspective Cannot Be Ignored
For Ukraine, the stakes remain incredibly high. As Zelenskyy pointed out, any conversation about peace or ceasefire agreements must include Ukraine at the table as a leading participant. Excluding Kyiv from these talks risks undermining the country’s sovereignty and emboldening Russian aggression. The international community must ensure that negotiations are equitable and do not disproportionately favor one side’s agenda.
The Need for Unified Global Leadership
Global leaders, particularly from Western democracies, need to present a unified stance in addressing the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Today’s fragmented responses may inadvertently empower authoritarian leaders like Putin, who bank on division and unilateral arrangements to achieve broader geopolitical goals. Cooperation, transparency, and inclusivity should guide the path forward to ensure durable peace and security.
Ultimately, Ukraine’s sovereignty must remain a core value in navigating these critical negotiations. Decisions made in exclusionary contexts risk long-term repercussions, threatening not only regional stability but also global norms on territorial integrity and self-determination.